Energy Use in the Transportation Sector

  • Home page
  • Total economy
  • Residential sector
  • Commercial sector
  • Industrial sector
  • Transportation sector

Photo of modes of transportation

The Office of Energy Efficiency at Natural Resources Canada has changed the base year from 1990 to 2000. This change was made to ensure that our data reflects developments in trends and structures of Canada’s energy end use and efficiency across sectors. It also synchronizes reporting on Canada’s energy use data with changes made by the International Energy Agency.

Highlights

As a result of energy efficiency improvements since 2000, in 2020:
  • Energy efficiency in the transportation sector improved 19%, saving Canadians 417.3 PJ in energy and $11.0 billion in costs.
  • Energy use in the transportation sector increased 4%. It would have increased 18% without energy efficiency improvements.
  • Canadians avoided 28.8 Mt in GHG emissions
  • Passenger transportation

    • Energy efficiency improved 14%, saving 178.5 PJ in energy and $4.5 billion in costs.
    • Passenger transportation energy use decreased 11%, but it would have remained unchanged without energy efficiency improvements.
    • Energy efficiency helped avoid 12.0 Mt in GHG emissions.

    Freight transportation

    • Energy efficiency improved 26%, saving 238.7 PJ in energy and $6.5 billion in costs.
    • Freight transportation energy use increased 22%, but it would have increased 48% without energy efficiency improvements.
    • Energy efficiency helped avoid 16.9 Mt in GHG emissions.

Overview Overview – Energy use

The sector is diverse and covers several modes of transportation, including road, air, rail and marine. In Canada, these modes of transportation are used for transporting both people and goods.

Canadian individuals and businesses spent $62.1 billion on fuel for transportation in 2020, which was almost 1.5 times that of the industrial sector. This is due to significantly higher cost of transportation fuels compared to energy sources used in the industrial and other sectors.

5_1.png
Text version

Distribution of transportation energy use by subsector, 2020

Percentage
Passenger transportation 47.9
Freight transportation 46.8
Off-road transportation 5.3
Passenger transportation accounted for 48% of total energy consumption, while freight transportation accounted for 47%. Off-road vehicles Footnote 1 accounted for the remaining 5%.
5_2.png
Text version

Distribution of transportation energy use by mode, 2020

Percentage
Road Passenger 41
Road Freight 39
Off road 5
Air 7
Rail 4
Marine 3

Energy use Transportation energy use

Total energy use by the transportation sector increased 4% between 2000 and 2020, from 2,265.9 PJ to 2,365.7 PJ, and associated GHG emissions increased 2%, from 160.1 Mt to 163.3 Mt.

Among the subsectors, freight transportation experienced the most rapid growth, representing 82% of the increase in transportation sector energy use. Off-road vehicles accounted for the remaining 18% increase. Passenger transportation saw an 11% decrease in energy use, a direct consequence of COVID-19.

The freight transportation subsector was the main contributor to the increased demand for diesel fuel.

5_3.png
Text version

Transportation energy use by energy source (petajoules), selected years

2000 2005 2010 2020
Motor gasoline 1,283 1,377 1,462 1,369
Diesel fuel oil 660 750 821 775
Aviation fuels Footnote * 240 258 229 166
Other Footnote * 83 100 104 55

Diesel consumption increased 17% between 2000 and 2020, which was driven by the increasing use of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles on Canadian roads. Moreover, motor gasoline consumption, including ethanol, also increased 7%, with freight transportation vehicles and off-road vehicles accounting for 69% and 31% of that increase, respectively.

Toward the end of the 1970s, the Canadian government proposed voluntary targets for the automotive industry. Performance standards for passenger vehicles improved from 13.1 L/100 km to 8.6 L/100 km between 1978 and 1985, but saw little further change up to 2010, because no strict fuel efficiency standards were in place. Targets for light trucks were introduced in 1990, resulting in a performance improvement from 11.8 L/100 km to 10.0 L/100 km by 2010.

In October 2010, the Government of Canada approved the Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations . The goal of these regulations was to reduce CO2 emissions by 12% to 19%, depending on the light-duty vehicle category.

For 2017–2025 model year passenger vehicles, the GHG emission target value applicable to a given vehicle’s footprint is expected to decrease by 5% on average per year, using the 2016 model year standards as the baseline and applying that rate each year, up to and including the 2025 model year. Most light trucks face greater challenges in terms of GHG emissions than typical passenger vehicles due to their specific features (towing capacity, storage room, additional passenger seat). Consequently, the target values for GHG emissions for 2017–2021 model year light trucks have decreased by a lower annual rate, i.e. 3.5%. In recent years, initiatives and regulations designed to encourage technological progress were introduced for all other transportation modes as well as to increase their energy efficiency and improve their performance.

Energy efficiency improvements in the transportation sector resulted in savings of $11 billion for Canadians in 2020.

Transportation energy use, with and without energy efficiency improvements, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

5_4.png
Text version

Transportation energy use, with and without energy efficiency improvements, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

Energy use with energy efficiency improvements Energy use without energy efficiency improvements
2000 2,157 2,157
2001 2,136 2,163
2002 2,161 2,217
2003 2,231 2,299
2004 2,311 2,392
2005 2,353 2,447
2006 2,333 2,494
2007 2,425 2,569
2008 2,411 2,563
2009 2,403 2,519
2010 2,487 2,669
2011 2,490 2,703
2012 2,517 2,750
2013 2,565 2,831
2014 2,522 2,860
2015 2,505 2,925
2016 2,500 3,023
2017 2,581 3,103
2018 2,682 3,135
2019 2,712 3,199
2020 2,218 2,635

Energy efficiency in the transportation sector improved 19% between 2000 and 2020, resulting in savings of 417.3 PJ in energy in 2020. These savings were driven by energy efficiency improvements in passenger transportation (178.5 PJ) and freight transportation (238.7 PJ).

Passenger Passenger transportation energy use

Passenger transportation infographic
Text version

Key drivers for passenger energy use

2000 2019
Total vehicles (million) 15.5 23.6
Light trucks (%) 29.1 44.9
Average per vehicle (km/year) 18,213 15,033
Pkm covered (billion) 456.4 579.2
Vehicles per person aged 18 years and over 0.66 0.79
5_5.png
Text version

Distribution of energy use by mode of passenger transportation, 2020

Percentage
Cars 34.3
Light trucks 40.5
Motorcycles 0.4
Air 21.8
Rail 0.1
Buses and urban transit 2.9

Light-duty vehicles (small cars, large cars, light trucks and motorcycles) were the main modes of transportation used by Canadians for passenger transportation Footnote 2 . Air transport, rail transport, and transportation by bus or coach were also used, though to a lesser extent. The unit of measurement used to measure the activity of these transportation modes is the passenger-kilometre (Pkm).

The number of vehicles per person aged 18 years and older has increased slightly over the past 20 years. New passenger vehicle registrations in 2020 were more than 20% lower than in 2019.

The distance covered in Pkm Footnote 3 for light vehicles (excluding urban transportation and coaches) increased on average by 0.3% per year. However, the distance covered in Pkm for urban transportation and coaches increased on average by 1.1% per year between 2000 and 2020.

Consequently, the public transit market share has increased over the past 20 years. Over this period, passenger transportation energy consumption decreased 11%, from 1,275.4 PJ to 1,134.1 PJ, and associated GHG emissions decreased 15%, from 89.4 Mt to 76.3 Mt.

5_6.png
Text version

Passenger transportation energy use by fuel type, 2000 and 2020 (petajoules)

2000 2020
Motor gasoline 971.5 917.0
Diesel fuel oil 59.0 46.6
Aviation fuels Footnote * 232.0 156.7
Other Footnote * 13.0 13.8
The mix of fuels used in the passenger transportation sub-sector has remained relatively constant between 2000 and 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on all sub-sectors in 2020. As a result, the relative share of fuel use has fluctuated more significantly, but should stabilize in 2023. Motor gasoline has been the main energy source, representing 81% of the fuel mix used in 2020.
5_7.png
Text version

Passenger transportation energy use by mode, 2000 and 2020 (petajoules)

2000 2020 Growth/decrease (%)
Rail 3.0 1.1 -63.2
Air 232.0 156.7 -32.4
Bus and urban transit 50.3 43.1 -14.3
Motorcycles 2.5 5.0 104.0
Light trucks 362.3 533.3 47.2
Cars 625.5 394.9 -36.9

A growing number of Canadians bought light trucks (including minivans and sport utility vehicles [SUVs]) instead of vehicles with a better fuel consumption rating. Light truck sales accounted for 68% of all new passenger vehicles sold in 2020, compared to 36% in 2000. This shift from cars to light trucks has resulted in a significant increase in passenger-transportation energy consumption. Light truck energy consumption increased at a faster pace (i.e. 47%) between 2000 and 2020 than any other mode of passenger transportation (except for motorcycles, which represent a small share of consumption).

Air transport, an increasingly popular mode of transportation, was significantly impacted by health crisis management measures in 2020. The pandemic’s impact was reflected in a significant decrease in activity of 41% in Pkm covered, resulting in a 32% decrease in energy consumption.

Freight Freight transportation energy use

Freight transportation infographic
Text version

Key drivers for freight energy use

2000 2019
Total freight trucks (million) 2.5 5.7
Heavy trucks 301,000 489,000
Average for heavy trucks (km/year) 93,281 86,631
Tkm travelled (billion) 240.1 368.4
Litres of fuel used per truck 7,700 5,000

In Canada, the freight transportation subsector includes four modes of transportation: road, air, marine and rail. Transportation by truck is divided into three types: light truck, medium truck and heavy truck. Energy consumption for freight transportation is linked to tonne-kilometres (Tkm) Footnote 4 .

5_10.png
Text version

Freight transportation energy use by mode, 2000 and 2020 (petajoules)

2000 2020 Growth/decrease (%)
Marine 108.2 74.0 -31.6
Rail 81.5 90.5 11.0
Air 8.1 9.5 16.7
Heavy trucks 408.2 454.1 11.3
Medium trucks 157.1 269.6 71.6
Light trucks 145.8 209.1 43.4

Freight transportation energy use increased 22% from 2000 to 2020. Consequently, there was a 21% increase in associated GHG emissions, from 64.8 Mt in 2000 to 78.2 Mt in 2020.

5_11.png
Text version

Freight transportation energy use by fuel type, 2000 and 2020 (petajoules)

2000 2020
Motor gasoline 229 328
Diesel fuel oil 601 729
Heavy fuel oil 61 35
Other Footnote * 17 15

The mix of fuels used in the freight transportation subsector remained relatively constant between 2000 and 2020. Diesel was the main energy source, representing 66% of all the fuels consumed for freight transportation.

Just-in-time delivery stimulated the demand for heavy truck transportation. Footnote 5

Using transport vehicles as virtual warehouses requires a transportation system that is “in time” and very efficient. The number of heavy trucks increased by 64% from 2000 to 2020. This new trend in the freight transportation subsector has contributed to the increase in activity. Heavy trucks transported 294.7 billion Tkm in 2020, an increase of 46% compared to 2000.

Despite the significant increase in the number of trucks, rail transport remains the main mode of freight transportation in Canada.

For many goods, such as coal and cereal, trucks are not an efficient mode of transportation. Rail and marine transport continue to be the modes of choice. They therefore have an important place in the freight transportation sector. Rail transport holds the first position in terms of Tkm of freight transported with 420.2 billion Tkm in 2020, 30% more than in 2000.

Passenger Passenger transportation energy intensity

Energy intensity decreased 10% between 2000 and 2020, from 2.0 MJ/Pkm to 1.8 MJ/Pkm, which was driven by improved vehicle fuel performance. Average fuel performance is measured in litres consumed per 100 kmL/100 km).

5_12.png
Text version

Passenger transportation energy intensity by mode, 2000 and 2020 (MJ/Pkm)

2000 2020 Growth/decrease (%)
Rail 1.9 4.6 141.9
Air 2.0 2.2 10.3
Bus and urban transit 1.1 0.7 -31.1
Motorcycles 1.5 1.5 3.0
Light trucks 2.5 2.1 -16.1
Cars 2.0 1.7 -14.3

All modes of transportation, except motorcycles, achieved a reduction in energy intensity. The significant decline in air transportation and passenger rail traffic meant that fewer people were travelling per km travelled. The intensity of these two modes increased by 10% and 142%, respectively.

Freight Freight transportation energy intensity

5_15.png
Text version

Freight transportation energy intensity by mode, 2000 and 2020 (MJ/Tkm)

2000 2020 Growth/decrease (%)
Marine 0.5 0.4 -31.4
Rail 0.3 0.2 -14.8
Air 3.5 3.8 10.2
Heavy trucks 2.0 1.7 -14.5
Medium trucks 7.8 5.7 -26.6
Light trucks 8.3 6.7 -19.4

Since 2000, all the modes of freight transportation have become more efficient with respect to energy consumption, based on the number of Tkm. However, in 2020, air transport was greatly affected, with energy intensity increased by 10% compared to 2000. Due to the Canadian government’s restrictions, it has been very difficult to optimize the quantity of freight transported by air. Accordingly, the sector’s energy intensity has slightly decreased by 3% over the period, from 1.17 MJ/Tkm to 1.14 MJ/Tkm.

Passenger Passenger transportation energy efficiency

Measuring the effect of energy efficiency

Without energy efficiency gains, energy use would have increased 3% instead of decreasing 11%.

5_13.png
Text version

Impact of activity, structure, service level and energy efficiency on the change in passenger transportation energy use, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

Petajoules
Total change in energy use -141.3
Activity effect 10.8
Structure effect 30.4
Energy efficiency effect -178.5
Other Footnote * -4.0

Various factors affecting change in energy consumption:

  • Activity effect – The activity effect (i.e. the number of Pkm travelled) resulted in an increase of 1% in energy, 10.8 PJ, and an increase of 0.7 Mt in associated GHG emissions.
  • Structure effect – Changes to the mix of transportation modes (or the relative share of Pkm attributed to air, rail, and road transportation) are used to measure structural changes. Thus, an overall change in structure would result in a decrease (or increase) in energy consumption if the relative share of a more (or less) effective mode increases in importance relative to others. The relative share of Pkm travelled increased greatly for passenger air transportation and light trucks. The overall structure effect was positive, given the growing popularity of minivans and SUVs, which are more energy-intensive than other transportation modes. As a result, the structure effect resulted in an increase of 30.4 PJ in energy and 2.0 Mt in associated GHG emissions.
  • Service level effect – There is no service level effect.
  • Weather effect – There is no weather effect.
  • Energy efficiency effect – The 14% improvement in energy efficiency saved 178.5 PJ in energy and 12.0 Mt in GHG emissions. The light vehicle segment (cars, light trucks and motorcycles) for passenger transportation accounted for 96% of those savings.

Passenger transportation energy use, with and without energy efficiency improvements, 2000–2019 (petajoules)

5_14.png
Text version

Passenger transportation energy use, with and without energy efficiency improvements, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

Energy use with energy efficiency improvements Energy use without energy efficiency improvements
2000 1,248 1,248
2001 1,221 1,251
2002 1,264 1,287
2003 1,272 1,293
2004 1,292 1,326
2005 1,312 1,360
2006 1,288 1,366
2007 1,325 1,420
2008 1,295 1,418
2009 1,293 1,430
2010 1,318 1,475
2011 1,316 1,495
2012 1,340 1,506
2013 1,370 1,534
2014 1,338 1,526
2015 1,366 1,572
2016 1,400 1,630
2017 1,423 1,674
2018 1,473 1,719
2019 1,489 1,752
2020 1,111 1,290

In 2020, energy efficiency improvements of 14% in passenger transportation saved Canadians $4.5 billion in costs.

Freight Freight transportation energy efficiency

Measuring the effect of energy efficiency

Without energy efficiency gains, energy use would have increased 48% instead of 22%.

5_16.png
Text version

Impact of activity, structure, service level and energy efficiency on the change in freight transportation energy use, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

Petajoules
Total change in energy use 197.8
Activity effect 245.0
Structure effect 191.6
Energy efficiency effect -238.7

Various factors affecting change in energy consumption:

  • Activity effect – The activity effect (i.e. the number of Tkm covered) resulted in an increase of 27% in energy, or 245.0 PJ, and 17.3 Mt in associated GHG emissions. This increase in the number of Tkm transported is driven by a 42% increase in truck activity and a 30% increase in rail freight transport.
  • Structure effect – Changes to the mix of transportation modes (or the relative share of Tkm attributed to air, rail, and road transportation) are used to measure changes in structure. Thus, an overall change in structure would result in a decrease (or increase) in energy consumption if the relative share of a more (or less) effective mode increases in importance relative to others. The change in modes is due to the increase in the relative share of goods transported by trucks compared to other modes. The overall structure effect was positive given the growth of Canada-US trade and the “just-in-time” delivery required by customers, thereby contributing to an increase in the use of road transportation modes, which are more energy-intensive than the others per Tkm. The structure effect resulted in an increase of 191.6 PJ in energy and 13.5 Mt in associated GHG emissions.
  • Service level effect – There is no service level effect.
  • Weather effect – There is no weather effect.
  • Energy efficiency effect – The 26% improvement in energy efficiency saved 238.7 PJ in energy and 16.9 Mt in GHG emissions. The road vehicle segment (light trucks, medium trucks, and heavy trucks) for freight transportation accounted for 82% of those savings.

Freight transportation energy use, with and without energy efficiency improvements, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

5_17.png
Text version

Freight transportation energy use, with and without energy efficiency improvements, 2000–2020 (petajoules)

Energy use with energy efficiency improvements Energy use without energy efficiency improvements
2000 909 909
2001 914 912
2002 897 929
2003 959 1,006
2004 1,018 1,065
2005 1,041 1,087
2006 1,046 1,128
2007 1,100 1,149
2008 1,115 1,146
2009 1,109 1,089
2010 1,169 1,194
2011 1,174 1,208
2012 1,176 1,243
2013 1,195 1,296
2014 1,183 1,335
2015 1,139 1,353
2016 1,100 1,392
2017 1,158 1,429
2018 1,210 1,416
2019 1,223 1,447
2020 1,107 1,346

In 2020, energy efficiency improvement in the freight transportation sector saved $6.5 billion in costs. An inversion of the trend curve is observed in 2009. This phenomenon can be explained by the economic recession of 2008-2010, which particularly affected freight transport efficiency. Medium and heavy trucks continued to travel carrying much fewer goods, thus increasing fuel consumption per Tkm.